Quiz: International Treaty Principles — 20 Fragen

Detaillierte Fragen und Antworten

1. What is the main test for deciding whether a legal relationship falls under public law rather than private law?

Whether one party acts in its capacity as government
Whether both parties are private persons
Whether the parties signed a written contract
Whether the dispute concerns only property

Whether one party acts in its capacity as government

Erklärung

Public law applies when the government acts in its capacity as government, especially in its relations with citizens or other authorities. A written contract or property dispute is not what determines the classification.

2. Which situation is most likely governed by private law?

A municipality renting office space for its administration
A public service imposing a sanction
The State supervising another public authority
A minister issuing a binding regulation

A municipality renting office space for its administration

Erklärung

When the government acts like a private person, such as renting a building, the relationship is generally governed by private law. The other options involve the exercise of public authority.

3. Which pair best represents core domains of private law?

Relations between states and diplomats
Administrative supervision and permits
Taxation and criminal penalties
Contracts and property

Contracts and property

Erklärung

Private law regulates relationships among citizens and private entities, including contracts and property. Taxation, permits, and diplomatic relations belong to public law.

4. What does curative legal protection mainly address?

Determining which court may hear a treaty dispute
Fixing the scope of constitutional revision
Repairing protection after rights or interests are harmed
Preventing disputes before any harm occurs

Repairing protection after rights or interests are harmed

Erklärung

Curative legal protection comes into play once the citizen has effectively been harmed by government action or inaction. Preventive protection, by contrast, aims to avoid the dispute in advance.

5. What does public law in the broad sense primarily cover?

Only criminal procedure and sanctions
Only contracts between private parties
Only inheritance and family law
Rules on public authorities and their interactions with private persons

Rules on public authorities and their interactions with private persons

Erklärung

Public law sensu lato covers the status and powers of public authorities and their interactions with private persons. It is broader than just criminal or administrative law.

6. Which concept means that a state agrees to be bound by a treaty even before it has entered into force?

Open treaty
Verdragspartij
Verdragsluitende staat
Closed treaty

Verdragsluitende staat

Erklärung

A verdragsluitende staat is a state that consents to be bound, even if the treaty is not yet in force. A verdragspartij is only present once the treaty has actually entered into force for that state.

7. Why must a treaty be in writing in this context?

Because the treaty definition requires a written agreement as legal source
Because writing is needed only for bilateral treaties
Because oral agreements are never legally binding
Because only written texts can be ratified by parliaments

Because the treaty definition requires a written agreement as legal source

Erklärung

A treaty is defined here as a written agreement that can serve as a legal source of rights and obligations. The writing requirement is part of the treaty concept itself.

8. What is the legal significance of direct effect for a treaty rule?

It allows the judge to ignore the treaty if domestic law conflicts
It applies only to political agreements, not legal ones
It makes the treaty valid only after a special constitutional revision
It lets the treaty produce legal consequences without further national measures

It lets the treaty produce legal consequences without further national measures

Erklärung

Direct effect means the treaty rule can operate in the domestic legal order without additional implementing measures. If domestic law conflicts with it, the judge must set aside the conflicting rule.

9. What can the Preconstituante do when it declares an existing constitutional provision revisable?

Decide the final constitutional wording itself
Bind the Constituante to a single amendment outcome
Indicate the article number that may be revised
Specify the exact direction and content of the amendment

Indicate the article number that may be revised

Erklärung

For an existing article, the Preconstituante must identify which article is open for revision. It generally cannot predetermine the amendment’s direction or content.

10. When the revision concerns new constitutional matter, what must the Preconstituante do?

Indicate that a new provision may be inserted and name the subject matter
Require that the new provision be worded exactly in advance
Leave the subject entirely open for the Constituante
Transfer all revising power to the King alone

Indicate that a new provision may be inserted and name the subject matter

Erklärung

For new matter, the Preconstituante must state that a new provision may be inserted and immediately indicate its subject matter. In that case, the Constituante is bound by those subject-matter indications.

11. Who has the final power to decide whether and how the Constitution is revised?

The Preconstituante
The Constitutional Court
The newly elected Constituante
The Council of Ministers

The newly elected Constituante

Erklärung

The Preconstituante only sets the possible scope of revision, while the Constituante decides whether and in what sense the Constitution is revised. That final revising power lies with the newly elected assembly.

12. What is the effect of the Preconstituante’s indication when it concerns new constitutional matter?

It binds the Constituante to the indicated subject matter
It is purely symbolic and has no legal effect
It gives the King unlimited amendment power
It requires a referendum before any revision

It binds the Constituante to the indicated subject matter

Erklärung

When new matter is expressly indicated, the Constituante may not regulate other matter in that newly inserted provision. The subject-matter indication therefore has binding force.

13. Who can conclude a treaty under international law?

Only states through their competent organs, and international organizations within their powers
Only courts acting on behalf of the state
Any private association with members
Only parliaments after publication

Only states through their competent organs, and international organizations within their powers

Erklärung

States conclude treaties through their competent organs, and international organizations can do so only within the powers granted to them. Treaty-making capacity is therefore not open to just any actor.

14. Why might a treaty be affected if it is signed by the wrong authority?

Because international organizations cannot ever sign treaties
Because the treaty title becomes invalid
Because a treaty must always be approved by referendum first
Because lack of authority can affect validity under rules on representation and competence

Because lack of authority can affect validity under rules on representation and competence

Erklärung

If the organ that concluded the treaty lacked authority, the validity of the treaty may be affected under international rules on representation and authority. The issue is competence, not the treaty’s title.

15. When is a reservation incompatible with a treaty?

When it is made by a large state
When it concerns a bilateral treaty
When it undermines the treaty's object and purpose
When it is not written in the treaty's official language

When it undermines the treaty's object and purpose

Erklärung

A reservation is not compatible when it undermines the treaty’s object and purpose. That is the core criterion under the Vienna Convention rule mentioned here.

16. What happens if a treaty is silent and a state makes a reservation?

Only the United Nations may decide
The treaty immediately ceases to exist
The reservation is treated as accepted after twelve months without reaction
The reservation is automatically invalid

The reservation is treated as accepted after twelve months without reaction

Erklärung

If there is no reaction within twelve months after notification, the reservation is deemed accepted under the silence rule. That is the standard response when the treaty does not provide otherwise.

17. What does a lack of reaction within the set period mean in the reservation procedure?

Automatic rejection of the reservation
Stilzwijgen, which lets the procedure continue automatically
A requirement to renegotiate the whole treaty
Immediate termination of the treaty

Stilzwijgen, which lets the procedure continue automatically

Erklärung

Stilzwijgen means no response within the time limit, and the procedure then continues automatically. It is not treated as an active rejection.

18. What characterizes the decision-making in the Overlegcomité?

It is based on political opportunité and consensus
It is taken by the Constitutional Court
It requires a constitutional referendum
It is judicially enforceable

It is based on political opportunité and consensus

Erklärung

The Overlegcomité acts through consensus and political opportunité, not through legally enforceable adjudication. Its decisions are not sanctions enforced by a court.

19. When does a treaty enter into force?

Only when every state in the world has signed it
Only after publication in a national official journal
On the date and in the manner provided by the treaty or by agreement between the negotiating states
Only after a judge declares it constitutional

On the date and in the manner provided by the treaty or by agreement between the negotiating states

Erklärung

A treaty enters into force according to its own provisions or by agreement between the negotiating states. That is the standard rule for entry into force.

20. What is the legal consequence of the communautaire alarmbelprocedure?

It suspends parliamentary treatment and sends the matter to the Council of Ministers for advice
It transfers the file to the Constitutional Court
It immediately annuls the bill
It prevents any future amendment of the bill

It suspends parliamentary treatment and sends the matter to the Council of Ministers for advice

Erklärung

The alarm bell procedure suspends parliamentary handling and gives the Council of Ministers 30 days to issue a reasoned opinion. It is a pause mechanism, not an annulment.

Mit Karteikarten lernen

Merke dir die Antworten mit 20 Karteikarten zu International Treaty Principles.

Public law — definition?

Law governing government and public authorities.

Private law — scope?

Relations among citizens and private entities.

Public law — focus?

Government-citizen and inter-government relations.

Karteikarten ansehen →

Lernzettel studieren

Lies den vollständigen Lernzettel zu International Treaty Principles.

Lernzettel ansehen →

Similar courses

Erstelle deine eigenen Quizze

Importiere deinen Kurs und die KI erstellt in 30 Sekunden Quizze mit Korrekturen.

Quiz-Generator