Adjudication Strategies in International Law

Estratto della scheda di revisione

📋 Course Outline

  1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication
  2. Inquisitorial versus adversarial evidence production
  3. Choice of law and judicial interpretation limits
  4. International judges and conservative interpretation
  5. Principal agent view of judges and incentives
  6. Incomplete contracts and judicial role
  7. Precedent, consistency, and de facto follow
  8. DSU structure: panels, appellate review, adoption
  9. WTO dispute settlement: compulsory adjudication and no self-help
  10. DSU objectives: withdrawal, compensation, suspension
  11. Property versus liability remedies in WTO
  12. EU judicial procedure: chambers, grand chamber, urgency

📖 1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication

🔑 Key Concepts & Definitions

  • Deep integration : Deep integration creates shared market rules by harmonizing competition conditions across jurisdictions.
  • Shallow integration : Shallow integration keeps national policy autonomy while requiring non-discrimination across jurisdictions.
  • Inquisitorial system : An inquisitorial system gives the judge authority to steer the case and actively produce or obtain evidence.
  • Adversarial system : An adversarial system relies on parties to present evidence, with the judge mainly evaluating what the parties submit.
  • Choice of law : Choice of law is the mechanism that determines which legal system governs a dispute.

📝 Essential Points

Leggi la scheda completa →

Anteprima del quiz

1. In what order do the DSU objectives prioritize remedies when a violation is found?

2. What is the main idea of a property-rule-style remedy in WTO dispute settlement?

3. What is the key institutional feature of WTO dispute settlement regarding enforcement?

Fai il quiz (12 domande) →

Anteprima delle flashcard

Deep vs shallow integration — difference?

Deep creates shared rules; shallow maintains national autonomy.

Inquisitorial system — role?

Judge actively steers case and produces evidence.

Adversarial system — role?

Parties produce evidence; judge evaluates submissions.

Choice of law — purpose?

Determines which legal system governs a dispute.

Inquisitorial evidence — fit?

Suitable when judge is trusted and active in fact-finding.

Adversarial evidence — fit?

Suitable when parties control evidence and rebuttal.

Vedi tutte le 24 flashcard →

Domande frequenti

Cosa copre la scheda di revisione su Adjudication Strategies in International Law?

La scheda di revisione copre i concetti essenziali di Adjudication Strategies in International Law. È organizzata per argomento per facilitare l'apprendimento e la memorizzazione, con definizioni chiave, spiegazioni e riassunti.

Leggi la scheda completa →

Quante domande ci sono nel quiz su Adjudication Strategies in International Law?

Il quiz contiene 12 domande a scelta multipla con correzioni e spiegazioni dettagliate per ogni risposta. Ideale per testare le tue conoscenze e identificare le lacune.

Fai il quiz (12 domande) →

Come studiare Adjudication Strategies in International Law con le flashcard?

Revizly offre 24 flashcard interattive su Adjudication Strategies in International Law. Ogni carta presenta una domanda sul fronte e la risposta sul retro, permettendo una revisione attiva ed efficace basata sulla ripetizione dilazionata.

Vedi tutte le 24 flashcard →

Similar courses

Create your own sheets from your courses

Import your PDF or paste your course, AI generates sheets, quizzes and flashcards in 30 seconds.