★ Must-know
📌 Because the regulation concerns concentrations rather than absolute amounts, Z-Corp can remain within legal limits by diluting its wastewater, creating a major loophole.
Further detail
Legal compliance versus broader responsibility
★ Must-know
📌 A well-structured problem has clear goals, fixed alternatives, usually at most one correct answer, and rules or methods that generate relatively straightforward solutions, whereas an ill-structured problem lacks a definitive formulation and may have inconsistent formulations.
Further detail
Arithmetic has one answer; moral design problems have competing acceptable solutions
State, analyze, choose, evaluate, reflect, enact
★ Must-know
📌 A conventional moral dilemma gives the agent limited options and makes every choice morally wrong, whereas Cooley's moral dilemma allows at least one permissible action but leaves moral residue.
Further detail
A moral problem conflicts with values; a dilemma leaves moral residue
Stakeholders, values, facts → options → cooperation or whistle-blowing
Intuition proposes acceptability; common sense weighs relevant values
★ Must-know
📌 First-order learning improves the achievement of given goals, whereas second-order learning concerns which goals to pursue and which moral values to consider.
Further detail
Inclusive, open deliberation → stronger overlapping consensus
★ Must-know
📌 The law-equals-morality fallacy equates legality with morality, whereas legal compliance does not necessarily establish moral acceptability.
Further detail
Legal is not automatically moral, and absence of evidence is not evidence of safety
★ Must-know
📌 Under the Quasi-Categorical Imperative, an act is morally right only if the agent does not treat any valuable being as a mere means.
📌 Under Reasonable Person Utilitarianism, an act is morally right only if a reasonable person would reasonably believe that its consequences will probably have utility at least as great as any alternative available at that time.
Further detail
Issue, evidence, solutions, RPU/QCI, conclusion, paradigm test, enactment
In the BART case, Holger Hsortvang, Max Blakenzee, and Robert Bruder raised safety concerns internally from 1969, bypassed management in 1971, were exposed publicly, and were fired without cause or appeal in March 1972.
The IEEE stated that engineers are responsible for the safety, health, and welfare of the public, and an accident injured passengers three weeks after BART began carrying passengers.
📌 A professional code is formulated by a professional association and is generally advisory, whereas a corporate code is formulated by a company and is generally disciplinary and mandatory.
Professional codes are generally advisory; corporate codes are generally mandatory
★ Must-know
Every profession:
Professional codes relate to: conducting the profession with integrity and honesty, obligations toward employers and clients, responsibility toward the public and society
📌 NSPE states that engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public, while FEANI requires preventing avoidable danger to health and safety and avoidable adverse environmental impacts.
Further detail
📌 Engineers should disclose an unavoidable conflict of interest to the interested parties and perform services only in areas of their competence.
I-C-P: integrity, clients, public
★ Must-know
Milton Friedman argues that corporations are responsible only to shareholders and must obey the law, while objections state that ethical conduct can improve profits and that laws may lag behind technological advances.
Corporate codes may contain:
Codes of conduct may be:
Further detail
📌 All shareholders are stakeholders, but not all stakeholders are shareholders.
Shareholder primacy versus responsibility to stakeholders and society
Types of Professional and Corporate Codes
| Code type | Issuer | Main function | Typical force |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional code | Professional association | Increase moral awareness and support professional judgment | Generally advisory |
| Corporate code | Company | Set employee guidelines and address moral dilemmas | Generally disciplinary and mandatory |
| Aspirational code | Profession or company | Express moral values | Value-expressing |
| Advisory code | Profession or company | Help judgment in concrete situations | Guiding |
| Disciplinary code | Profession or company | Require conformity with norms | Mandatory |
Test your knowledge on Engineering Ethics and Professional Codes with 38 multiple-choice questions with detailed corrections.
1. Why might Z-Corp’s conventional wastewater test understate the environmental risk from its computer-parts production?
2. How can Z-Corp exploit a loophole when regulations limit pollutant concentrations rather than total pollutant amounts?
Memorize the key concepts of Engineering Ethics and Professional Codes with 73 interactive flashcards.
Which toxic elements does Z-Corp release through wastewater?
Lead and arsenic.
How does Z-Corp's conventional measurement compare to the newer method?
It reports lower concentrations than the newer, more reliable method.
Why can Z-Corp stay within legal limits by diluting wastewater?
Because regulation concerns concentrations, not absolute amounts.
Import your course and AI generates sheets, quizzes and flashcards in 30 seconds.
Sheet generator