International Relations Midterm Practice Quiz (37 questions)

All questions and answers

1. What does anarchy mean in international relations?

The absence of a central authority above sovereign states
The competition among states for greater economic influence
The breakdown of political order within and among states
The concentration of authority in a global government

The absence of a central authority above sovereign states

Explanation

Anarchy describes an international system without a central authority above sovereign states. It does not mean chaos, which refers to disorder.

2. A state makes its own political decisions and governs its territory without being formally subordinate to another state. Which concept does this illustrate?

Sovereignty
Collective security
Diplomatic recognition
The international system

Sovereignty

Explanation

Sovereignty is a state's authority to govern its territory and make its own political decisions without formal subordination to another state. The international system describes the broader structure of actors and their relationships, not this authority of an individual state.

3. Which description best captures the subject matter of International Relations?

Interactions among states and other international actors
The legal responsibilities of international organizations
The economic activities of multinational corporations
The domestic political institutions of sovereign states

Interactions among states and other international actors

Explanation

International Relations studies interactions among states as well as actors such as international organizations, corporations, NGOs, and individuals. Domestic institutions alone are a narrower subject than this field.

4. What is the international system?

The structure formed by international actors and their relationships
A collection of domestic institutions within each state
A global authority that governs relations among sovereign states
A treaty framework that regulates cooperation among governments

The structure formed by international actors and their relationships

Explanation

The international system is the structure formed by states and other actors and the relationships between them. A global authority is not part of its definition; international relations lack a central authority above sovereign states.

5. A government assesses foreign policy chiefly in terms of national interest, survival, security, and power in an anarchic system. Which theoretical perspective does this reflect?

Liberalism
Realism
Constructivism
Institutionalism

Realism

Explanation

Realism emphasizes states, power, survival, national interest, and security in an anarchic international system. Liberalism is the most plausible alternative, but it places greater emphasis on cooperation and institutions.

6. A group of states uses diplomacy, trade, shared rules, and international institutions to pursue cooperation. Which theory most closely emphasizes this approach?

Realism
Balance-of-power theory
Constructivism
Liberalism

Liberalism

Explanation

Liberalism holds that states and other actors can cooperate through institutions, trade, diplomacy, and international rules. Realism instead gives greater priority to power and security.

7. A government combines cultural diplomacy that attracts foreign audiences with economic pressure to advance a foreign-policy goal. What kind of power strategy is it using?

Smart power, combining soft and hard power strategically
Soft power, relying on attraction through culture and diplomacy
Balance of power, distributing capabilities among states
Hard power, relying on military force or economic pressure

Smart power, combining soft and hard power strategically

Explanation

Smart power strategically combines hard power, such as economic pressure, with soft power, such as cultural diplomacy. Soft power alone relies on attraction rather than the coercive economic measure in this example.

8. What was the main purpose and method of the Concert of Europe after Napoleon's defeat?

To establish a central European government with authority over the great powers
To maintain stability through great-power consultation, diplomacy, and balance of power
To promote industrial expansion through agreements among European states
To replace diplomacy with military alliances directed against France

To maintain stability through great-power consultation, diplomacy, and balance of power

Explanation

The Concert of Europe was a system of great-power consultation established after Napoleon's defeat to maintain stability through diplomacy and balance of power. It relied on consultation among great powers rather than a central government governing them.

9. What was an important consequence of German unification in 1871 for the European balance of power?

It shifted the principal Concert powers to include a unified Italy
It established the Concert of Europe after Napoleon's defeat
It created a powerful industrial and military state in central Europe
It restored Napoleon's influence across central Europe

It created a powerful industrial and military state in central Europe

Explanation

German unification in 1871 created a powerful industrial and military state in central Europe. The Concert of Europe had been established after Napoleon's defeat, well before German unification.

10. What geopolitical struggle is described by the Eastern Question?

Disputes over the division of German colonies among European powers after the First World War
Rivalry between Russia and Britain over control of Persia and Central Asia
Conflicts over the boundaries of newly independent Balkan states after the Ottoman Empire dissolved
Competition over Ottoman territories and influence as the empire declined, especially in southeastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean

Competition over Ottoman territories and influence as the empire declined, especially in southeastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean

Explanation

The Eastern Question concerned competition over Ottoman lands and influence as the empire weakened. Rivalry in Central Asia was a related imperial contest, but it does not define the Eastern Question.

11. What event directly triggered the July Crisis of 1914?

Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia on 28 July 1914
Germany's invasion of Belgium after declaring war on France
Russia's mobilization in support of Serbia during the July Crisis
Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914

Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914

Explanation

Princip's assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo was the immediate trigger of the crisis. The declaration of war on Serbia came later, while nationalism and alliance tensions were underlying causes rather than the triggering event.

12. Which sequence correctly describes key steps in the July Crisis after the assassination?

Germany gave Austria-Hungary a blank cheque; Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia; Russia mobilized; Germany declared war on Russia and France and invaded Belgium; Britain entered
Russia gave Serbia a blank cheque; Serbia declared war on Austria-Hungary; Germany mobilized; Britain declared war on France; Italy entered
Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia; Germany mobilized for Serbia; France invaded Belgium; Britain declared war on Germany
Germany gave Serbia a blank cheque; Russia declared war on Austria-Hungary; France invaded Belgium; Austria-Hungary entered the war against Britain

Germany gave Austria-Hungary a blank cheque; Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia; Russia mobilized; Germany declared war on Russia and France and invaded Belgium; Britain entered

Explanation

Germany backed Austria-Hungary, whose declaration of war on Serbia was followed by Russian mobilization, German declarations of war, the invasion of Belgium, and British entry. The sequence beginning with Russia giving Serbia a blank cheque reverses the key diplomatic steps.

13. Why did diplomacy fail to contain the 1914 crisis?

European governments agreed on the crisis's causes but lacked a shared timetable for peace talks
A binding international court required states to settle disputes through military action
Alliance commitments, mobilization fears, nationalism, mistrust, miscalculation, and the security dilemma made compromise difficult
The Ottoman Empire controlled the alliance system and blocked negotiations among European powers

Alliance commitments, mobilization fears, nationalism, mistrust, miscalculation, and the security dilemma made compromise difficult

Explanation

Several interacting pressures—including alliances, fears about mobilization, nationalism, mistrust, and miscalculation—undermined diplomacy. A binding international court did not compel states to resolve the crisis through war.

14. What was the central purpose of the Paris Peace System established after the First World War?

To restore the prewar German-led balance of power and remove all limits on national militaries
To divide the former Ottoman Empire while leaving the causes of the European war unresolved
To create a stable postwar order, particularly through the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, and prevent another major war
To establish a permanent European federation with a unified government and armed forces

To create a stable postwar order, particularly through the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, and prevent another major war

Explanation

The Paris Peace System was the postwar settlement, especially the Treaty of Versailles, intended to establish stability and prevent another major war. It did not create a unified European government or armed force.

15. What consequence followed when the US Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles?

The Treaty of Versailles was replaced by a separate peace agreement with Germany
The League of Nations moved its headquarters from the United States to Europe
The United States remained outside the League of Nations
The United States joined the League but refused to fund its peacekeeping operations

The United States remained outside the League of Nations

Explanation

The Senate's refusal to ratify the treaty left the United States outside the League of Nations. The United States did not join the League while merely withholding funds.

16. Why did the League of Nations depend on its members to enforce its decisions?

It could enforce decisions only through the military forces of defeated powers
It relied on a permanent army controlled by the United States
It had no permanent army of its own
It had no authority to issue decisions to member states

It had no permanent army of its own

Explanation

The League had no permanent army, so enforcement depended on member states. It did issue decisions, but lacked its own standing military force to carry them out.

17. Which pattern best illustrates the League of Nations' failure to stop aggression?

It prevented Italy's conquest of Ethiopia but failed to stop Japan's occupation of Manchuria and Germany's expansion
It stopped German rearmament but failed to prevent Japanese and Italian expansion outside Europe
It failed to stop Japan's occupation of Manchuria, Italy's conquest of Ethiopia, and German rearmament and expansion
It stopped Japan's occupation of Manchuria but failed to prevent Italy's conquest of Ethiopia and Germany's rearmament

It failed to stop Japan's occupation of Manchuria, Italy's conquest of Ethiopia, and German rearmament and expansion

Explanation

The League failed to stop Japanese occupation in Manchuria, Italy's conquest of Ethiopia, and German rearmament and expansion. It did not successfully halt the Manchurian occupation while failing only in the other cases.

18. When did the Great Depression begin, and what was its scope?

It began in 1937 and became a worldwide crisis during the Second Sino-Japanese War
It began in 1929 and developed into a worldwide economic crisis
It began in 1919 and spread mainly through European war debts
It began in 1931 and remained primarily a crisis in East Asia

It began in 1929 and developed into a worldwide economic crisis

Explanation

The Great Depression began in 1929 and became a worldwide economic crisis. The year 1931 marks Japan's invasion of Manchuria, not the beginning of the Depression.

19. How did the Great Depression contribute to rising international tensions?

It strengthened collective security by increasing trade and reducing political extremism
It stabilized domestic politics and redirected international competition toward diplomacy
It encouraged protectionism, political instability, extremist movements, economic nationalism, and weaker collective security
It reduced economic nationalism while encouraging governments to remove trade barriers

It encouraged protectionism, political instability, extremist movements, economic nationalism, and weaker collective security

Explanation

The Depression fostered protectionism, political instability, extremist movements, and economic nationalism while weakening collective security. It did not strengthen collective security through increased trade.

20. Which interpretation best describes the Great Depression's relationship to the outbreak of the Second World War?

It directly caused the war by itself, making political decisions and international conflicts unimportant
It prevented aggressive expansion by making international cooperation stronger during the crisis
It did not independently cause the war, but weakened the international system and helped create conditions for aggressive expansion
It had little effect on international affairs because its economic effects stayed within national borders

It did not independently cause the war, but weakened the international system and helped create conditions for aggressive expansion

Explanation

The Depression was not an independent cause of the war, but it weakened the international system and contributed to conditions that enabled aggressive powers to expand. Treating it as the sole cause ignores the broader political and international factors involved.

21. Why was the United Nations established in 1945 after World War II?

To replace national governments with a global governing authority
To coordinate the political unification of European states
To maintain international peace and security and promote cooperation
To oversee the restoration of colonial rule in postwar territories

To maintain international peace and security and promote cooperation

Explanation

The UN was established after World War II to maintain international peace and security and promote cooperation. Its creation was not intended to establish a global government or restore colonial rule.

22. A state violates international peace, and the Security Council considers imposing sanctions. Which UN Charter provision gives the Council authority to authorize such enforcement measures?

The General Assembly's budgetary procedures
The International Court of Justice's advisory jurisdiction
Chapter I
Chapter VII

Chapter VII

Explanation

Chapter VII empowers the Security Council to authorize sanctions and other enforcement measures. The General Assembly and International Court of Justice have distinct roles and do not provide this Chapter VII authority.

23. Which statement correctly distinguishes the United States' relationship to the United Nations from its relationship to the League of Nations?

The United States joined both organizations as a founding member.
The United States was absent from both organizations at their founding.
The United States joined the League of Nations but was absent from the UN.
The United States became a UN founding member but was absent from the League of Nations.

The United States became a UN founding member but was absent from the League of Nations.

Explanation

The United States became a founding member of the United Nations, unlike its absence from the League of Nations. It was not a founding member of both organizations.

24. Which combination best explains the origins of the Cold War?

Competition between colonial empires, with little involvement by the superpowers
Economic cooperation, shared political systems, and declining military rivalry
Territorial disputes alone, without ideological or security concerns
Ideological differences, security fears, power competition, and mutual mistrust

Ideological differences, security fears, power competition, and mutual mistrust

Explanation

The Cold War combined ideological differences between the United States and Soviet Union with security fears, power competition, and mutual mistrust. Explaining it through territorial disputes alone leaves out these other central causes.

25. How does Mutually Assured Destruction help explain nuclear deterrence?

Each side's ability to retaliate devastatingly makes a nuclear attack extremely dangerous.
A nuclear attack allows the attacked side to avoid further military consequences.
Both sides agree to eliminate their weapons before any crisis begins.
A side's first strike can prevent the other from launching any retaliatory attack.

Each side's ability to retaliate devastatingly makes a nuclear attack extremely dangerous.

Explanation

Mutually Assured Destruction describes how both sides could inflict devastating retaliation after a nuclear attack, making full-scale nuclear war extremely dangerous. A first strike that removes the opponent's capacity to retaliate is not the defining condition.

26. What action did President John F. Kennedy take in response to the Soviet deployment of nuclear missiles to Cuba in October 1962?

He launched a ground invasion of Cuba.
He imposed a naval quarantine around Cuba.
He withdrew Jupiter missiles from Turkey immediately.
He authorized Soviet forces to remain on the island.

He imposed a naval quarantine around Cuba.

Explanation

Kennedy responded to the Soviet missile deployment with a naval quarantine. A ground invasion was not the response identified for this stage of the crisis.

27. Which combination formed part of the resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis?

The Soviet Union retained its missiles, while the United States pledged to withdraw from NATO and recognize Soviet control of Cuba.
The Soviet Union removed its missiles, the United States pledged not to invade Cuba, and it secretly agreed to withdraw Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
Both sides publicly agreed to expand their missile deployments in the Caribbean and Mediterranean.
The United States removed its missiles from Cuba, while the Soviet Union pledged not to invade Turkey.

The Soviet Union removed its missiles, the United States pledged not to invade Cuba, and it secretly agreed to withdraw Jupiter missiles from Turkey.

Explanation

The settlement included Soviet missile removal, a US pledge not to invade Cuba, and a secret US agreement to withdraw Jupiter missiles from Turkey. The crisis did not end with the Soviet missiles remaining in Cuba.

28. How did the United States and Soviet Union compete in developing countries during the Cold War?

They focused their rivalry on direct territorial control of every developing country.
They used proxy wars, ideological competition, strategic interests, and efforts to influence newly independent states.
They competed by forming a unified administration for newly independent states.
They avoided political influence and limited their competition to domestic economic policy.

They used proxy wars, ideological competition, strategic interests, and efforts to influence newly independent states.

Explanation

The superpowers competed indirectly through proxy wars, ideological rivalry, strategic interests, and attempts to influence newly independent states. Their competition did not take the form of a unified administration.

29. A newly independent government chooses policies that serve its own domestic and regional priorities, despite pressure from both Cold War superpowers. What does this illustrate?

Cold War competition ended whenever a state gained independence.
Third World governments and movements pursued their own political, economic, and strategic objectives.
Developing countries had no independent political or economic priorities.
Newly independent states acted as passive instruments of superpower policy.

Third World governments and movements pursued their own political, economic, and strategic objectives.

Explanation

Third World governments and movements were not merely passive pawns; they pursued their own political, economic, and strategic objectives. Superpower pressure did not mean that these states lacked independent aims.

30. Why did cross-border pollution make international cooperation important?

It shifted responsibility for local environmental damage to international organizations.
It made environmental regulations identical across national economies.
Its effects could extend beyond the country where the pollution originated.
It showed that industrial development reduced environmental risks across borders.

Its effects could extend beyond the country where the pollution originated.

Explanation

Pollution crossing national borders can cause damage that no single state can contain, creating a need for cooperation. This does not make regulations identical; states may still differ in their policies and priorities.

31. Two countries agree that climate action is needed but disagree over who should pay and how quickly development should proceed; what best explains their disagreement?

They differ over costs, historical responsibility, and the balance between development and protection.
They dispute whether international organizations can provide diplomatic forums.
They differ because scientific evidence prevents governments from evaluating environmental risks.
They disagree because environmental damage cannot cross national borders.

They differ over costs, historical responsibility, and the balance between development and protection.

Explanation

Countries can disagree about the costs of action, responsibility for past emissions, and the trade-off between development and environmental protection. The disagreement is not evidence that environmental damage stays within national borders.

32. Which arrangement characterized the Bretton Woods monetary system established in 1944?

Floating exchange rates centered on the dollar, convertible into gold at $35 per ounce.
Fixed but adjustable exchange rates centered on the pound, convertible into gold at $35 per ounce.
Fixed exchange rates centered on gold, with currencies convertible into dollars at $35 per ounce.
Fixed but adjustable exchange rates centered on the dollar, convertible into gold at $35 per ounce.

Fixed but adjustable exchange rates centered on the dollar, convertible into gold at $35 per ounce.

Explanation

Bretton Woods organized fixed but adjustable exchange rates around the US dollar, which foreign monetary authorities could convert into gold at $35 per ounce. Floating rates, by contrast, move primarily with market forces.

33. How did growing US external liabilities undermine confidence in Bretton Woods?

They increased US gold holdings and made dollar conversion more secure.
They prompted foreign monetary authorities to replace the dollar with fixed gold prices.
They increased international dollar holdings and raised doubts about US gold convertibility.
They reduced international dollar holdings and strengthened confidence in US gold reserves.

They increased international dollar holdings and raised doubts about US gold convertibility.

Explanation

Growing US external liabilities put more dollars into international circulation and raised doubts that the United States could maintain gold convertibility. The increase in dollar holdings did not strengthen confidence in the system's gold backing.

34. What did President Richard Nixon do on 15 August 1971?

He restored dollar-gold convertibility for foreign monetary authorities.
He established the Bretton Woods system's dollar-gold exchange rate.
He suspended dollar-gold convertibility for foreign monetary authorities.
He introduced floating exchange rates for all major currencies.

He suspended dollar-gold convertibility for foreign monetary authorities.

Explanation

Nixon suspended the ability of foreign monetary authorities to convert dollars into gold on 15 August 1971. Major currencies moved toward floating rates later, in 1973, rather than as part of that specific action.

35. What monetary shift followed failed efforts to restore stable exchange rates between 1971 and 1973?

Major currencies returned to defined parities maintained by central authorities.
Major currencies adopted a common exchange rate fixed directly to gold.
Major currencies moved toward rates shaped primarily by market forces.
Major currencies became pegged to the dollar at newly adjustable parities.

Major currencies moved toward rates shaped primarily by market forces.

Explanation

In 1973, major currencies moved toward floating exchange rates, which depend primarily on market forces, effectively ending Bretton Woods. Returning to defined parities would have meant fixed rather than floating rates.

36. Which approach best demonstrates a strong International Relations exam answer?

State a position, repeat it in different words, and omit historical evidence to preserve focus.
List relevant dates, summarize the topic, and leave the implications for the reader to infer.
Define the concept, answer directly, support arguments with historical examples, add nuance, and conclude with broader significance.
Introduce several concepts, focus on one example, and avoid a direct conclusion.

Define the concept, answer directly, support arguments with historical examples, add nuance, and conclude with broader significance.

Explanation

A strong answer defines its key concept, responds directly, supports its reasoning with historical examples, adds nuance, and concludes with broader significance. Merely listing dates does not explain or substantiate an argument.

37. Why is explaining causal relationships more useful than memorizing isolated dates in an International Relations answer?

It shows how events produce consequences, such as the Manchurian crisis weakening collective security and encouraging further aggression.
It allows an answer to replace historical evidence with general claims about international politics.
It demonstrates that major-power cooperation had little influence on the League's response to Manchuria.
It shows that the League's failure in Manchuria strengthened collective security and discouraged further aggression.

It shows how events produce consequences, such as the Manchurian crisis weakening collective security and encouraging further aggression.

Explanation

Causal reasoning connects the League's failure in Manchuria to weakened collective security, further aggression, and dependence on major-power cooperation. Treating the failure as a strengthening of collective security reverses the causal relationship.

Study with flashcards

Lock in the answers with 92 flashcards on International Relations Midterm.

What does International Relations study?

Interactions among states and other international actors.

Which organizations are among the actors studied in International Relations?

International organizations.

What authority does sovereignty give a state?

Authority to govern its territory and make its own political decisions without formal subordination to another state.

See the flashcards →

Read the study guide

Go over the full study guide for International Relations Midterm.

Read the study guide →

Related classes

Make your own practice quizzes

Upload your class notes and Revizly writes a practice quiz with explained answers in about a minute.

Quiz maker