Adjudication Strategies in International Law

Trecho da ficha de revisão

📋 Course Outline

  1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication
  2. Inquisitorial versus adversarial evidence production
  3. Choice of law and judicial interpretation limits
  4. International judges and conservative interpretation
  5. Principal agent view of judges and incentives
  6. Incomplete contracts and judicial role
  7. Precedent, consistency, and de facto follow
  8. DSU structure: panels, appellate review, adoption
  9. WTO dispute settlement: compulsory adjudication and no self-help
  10. DSU objectives: withdrawal, compensation, suspension
  11. Property versus liability remedies in WTO
  12. EU judicial procedure: chambers, grand chamber, urgency

📖 1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication

🔑 Key Concepts & Definitions

  • Deep integration : Deep integration creates shared market rules by harmonizing competition conditions across jurisdictions.
  • Shallow integration : Shallow integration keeps national policy autonomy while requiring non-discrimination across jurisdictions.
  • Inquisitorial system : An inquisitorial system gives the judge authority to steer the case and actively produce or obtain evidence.
  • Adversarial system : An adversarial system relies on parties to present evidence, with the judge mainly evaluating what the parties submit.
  • Choice of law : Choice of law is the mechanism that determines which legal system governs a dispute.

📝 Essential Points

Leia a ficha completa →

Prévia do quiz

1. In what order do the DSU objectives prioritize remedies when a violation is found?

2. What is the main idea of a property-rule-style remedy in WTO dispute settlement?

3. What is the key institutional feature of WTO dispute settlement regarding enforcement?

Faça o quiz (12 perguntas) →

Prévia dos flashcards

Deep vs shallow integration — difference?

Deep creates shared rules; shallow maintains national autonomy.

Inquisitorial system — role?

Judge actively steers case and produces evidence.

Adversarial system — role?

Parties produce evidence; judge evaluates submissions.

Choice of law — purpose?

Determines which legal system governs a dispute.

Inquisitorial evidence — fit?

Suitable when judge is trusted and active in fact-finding.

Adversarial evidence — fit?

Suitable when parties control evidence and rebuttal.

Veja todos os 24 flashcards →

Perguntas frequentes

O que a ficha de revisão sobre Adjudication Strategies in International Law cobre?

A ficha de revisão cobre os conceitos essenciais de Adjudication Strategies in International Law. Está organizada por tópicos para facilitar o aprendizado e a memorização, com definições chave, explicações e resumos.

Leia a ficha completa →

Quantas perguntas há no quiz de Adjudication Strategies in International Law?

O quiz contém 12 perguntas de múltipla escolha com correções e explicações detalhadas para cada resposta. Ideal para testar seu conhecimento e identificar lacunas.

Faça o quiz (12 perguntas) →

Como estudar Adjudication Strategies in International Law com flashcards?

Revizly oferece 24 flashcards interativos sobre Adjudication Strategies in International Law. Cada cartão apresenta uma pergunta na frente e a resposta no verso, permitindo uma revisão ativa e eficaz baseada na repetição espaçada.

Veja todos os 24 flashcards →

Similar courses

Create your own sheets from your courses

Import your PDF or paste your course, AI generates sheets, quizzes and flashcards in 30 seconds.