Hoja de repaso: International Dispute Settlement and Justice

International Dispute Settlement and Justice: Revision Sheet

1. 📌 Essentials

• Dispute: Opposite legal or factual claims requiring proof of existence.
• Jurisdiction depends on dispute existence, communication, and acceptance.
• Main settlement methods: friendly negotiations, arbitration, judicial decisions.
• International Court of Justice (ICJ) applies international law; can decide ex aequo et bono agreed.
• Sovereignty and consent are fundamental; limits State liability and jurisdiction.
• Arbitration is flexible, consent-based, and decisions are binding.
• International courts include ICJ, regional courts (ECHR, Inter-American), and specialized tribunals (ICC, investment tribunals).
• Enforcement relies on political will, prior consent, and cooperation.
• Fragmented system; no unified global justice mechanism.
• Common types: inter-State, investor-State, private, environmental, criminal, family.

2. 🧩 Key Structures & Components

• ICJ (International Court of Justice): Decides disputes based on treaties, customs, general principles.
• Regional Courts: ECHR (Strasbourg), Inter-American, African Courts.
• International Criminal Court (ICC): Prosecutes individuals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide.
• Arbitration Bodies: ICSID (investment), commercial arbitration panels.
• Specialized Tribunals: ITLOS (Law of the Sea), ad hoc tribunals.
• Dispute Resolution Methods: Negotiation, mediation, arbitration, judicial settlement.
• International Treaties: NAFTA, BITs, Rome Statute.
• International Law Sources: Treaties, customary law, general principles.

3. 🔬 Functions, Mechanisms & Relationships

• Dispute existence: Requires communication + opposition (e.g., diplomatic notes, legal claims).
• Jurisdiction: Established when dispute exists, parties communicate, and consent is given.
• Settlement hierarchy: Friendly negotiations → Mediation/conciliation → Arbitration → Judicial settlement.
• ICJ role: Decides disputes per Art 38 (treaties, customs, general principles); may decide ex aequo et bono if permitted.
• Arbitration: Consent-based, decisions (awards) are binding, no appeal.
• Enforcement: Depends on State cooperation, prior consent, and political factors.
• Sovereignty: Limits jurisdiction; immunity protects States from suit.
• Fragmentation: Multiple courts with overlapping jurisdiction; no single global system.
• Dispute types: Inter-State, investor-State, private, criminal, environmental, family.
• International criminal justice: ICC prosecutes individuals; based on Rome Statute.
• Human rights: Courts (ECHR, Inter-American) adjudicate individual and State cases.
• Environmental law: Uses reporting, monitoring, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
• Labor law: ILO standards enforce labor rights via conventions and supervision.

4. 📊 Comparative Table

Item	Key Features	Notes / Differences
Dispute	Opposite views on legal/factual points; must prove existence	Communication + opposition required
Jurisdiction	Based on dispute existence, communication, consent	No jurisdiction without dispute or consent
Friendly Settlement	Direct negotiations, unilateral declarations	Non-binding, aims to resolve amicably
Arbitration	Consent-based, decisions binding, flexible procedures	No appeal; ad hoc or institutional
ICJ (Art 38)	Decides disputes via treaties, customs, principles	Can decide ex aequo et bono if agreed
Investment Disputes	ICSID (since 1965), protects foreign investments	158 states ratified; awards enforceable
Human Rights Courts	ECHR, Inter-American, African courts	Individual and State cases; binding judgments
International Criminal Court	Prosecutes individuals for crimes against humanity	Rome Statute (1998); based in The Hague
Environmental Law	Reporting, review, dispute resolution mechanisms	Support-oriented, non-punitive
Labor Standards (ILO)	Conventions, tripartite supervision, complaints	Enforces fundamental rights globally

5. 🗂️ Hierarchical Diagram (ASCII)

Dispute Resolution System
 ├─ Dispute Existence
 │    ├─ Communication
 │    └─ Opposition
 ├─ Settlement Methods
 │    ├─ Friendly Negotiation
 │    ├─ Mediation / Conciliation
 │    ├─ Arbitration
 │    └─ Judicial Settlement (ICJ, regional courts)
 ├─ Courts & Tribunals
 │    ├─ ICJ (Art 38)
 │    ├─ Regional Courts (ECHR, Inter-American)
 │    ├─ Specialized Courts (ICC, ITLOS)
 │    └─ Arbitration Bodies (ICSID, commercial)
 ├─ Principles
 │    ├─ Sovereignty
 │    ├─ Consent
 │    └─ Immunity
 └─ Enforcement
      ├─ Political Will
      └─ Legal Cooperation

6. ⚠️ High-Yield Pitfalls & Confusions

• Confusing jurisdictional bases: dispute existence vs. consent.
• Believing all disputes are justiciable; some lack jurisdiction or consent.
• Overestimating the power of international courts; enforcement is often limited.
• Mixing up ICJ's advisory opinions vs. contentious cases.
• Assuming arbitration decisions are appealable; they are final.
• Overlooking the fragmentation: multiple courts, no unified system.
• Confusing State immunity with jurisdictional limits.
• Misunderstanding the scope of human rights courts: individual vs. State cases.
• Ignoring the political nature of enforcement and compliance.
• Thinking environmental and climate mechanisms are punitive; they are mainly supportive.

7. ✅ Final Exam Checklist

• Understand what constitutes a dispute and the requirements for its existence.
• Know the sources of international law used by ICJ (treaties, customs, principles).
• Differentiate between friendly settlement, arbitration, and judicial settlement.
• Recognize the role and jurisdiction of ICJ under Art 38.
• Be familiar with ICSID and its function in investment disputes.
• Know the scope and jurisdiction of human rights courts (ECHR, Inter-American).
• Understand the Rome Statute and ICC's role in international criminal justice.
• Comprehend the principles of sovereignty, consent, and immunity.
• Recognize the importance of enforcement mechanisms and their limitations.
• Be aware of the fragmentation and overlaps in international dispute resolution.
• Understand the role of treaties like NAFTA, BITs, and their dispute mechanisms.
• Know how environmental and climate disputes are managed.
• Be familiar with ILO standards and their enforcement.
• Recognize the importance of cooperation and political will in enforcement.
• Understand the hierarchical structure of dispute resolution options.
• Be aware of common pitfalls and misconceptions in international dispute settlement.

This revision sheet condenses core concepts, structures, and mechanisms to prepare effectively for exams on international dispute settlement and justice.